Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | [Snort-users] Sensor 'sanity' |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 8 Nov 2007 21:33:24 -0400 |
Hi, I am not sure about how most people deal with this but I would love any insight. In an overtaxed environment where I just don't have the time to coddle each sensor, what is a common practice to make sure that the sensors are actually still sane? Most of my sensors are sittings on span/mirrored ports on gear that I don't directly manage. Is/would it be possible to construct a preprocessor that could actually fire and tell me that the link isn't 'typical' anymore? Thanks. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] MMAP and odd looking stats, Todd Wease |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Snort-users] CanSecWest 2008 CFP (deadline Nov 30, conf Mar 26-28) and PacSec Dojo's, Dragos Ruiu |
| Previous by Thread: | [Snort-users] MMAP and odd looking stats, John Hally |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-users] Sensor 'sanity', Paul Halliday |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |