Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-users] Taking Down Wifi |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 29 Aug 2007 06:06:41 -0500 |
I have no idea :(. All I know is that passive sniffing and being connected at the same time just do not work.
Kismet and company switch channels in order to scan, which automatically drops you from whatever AP you were connected to on the (now) old channel. Not sure why just firing up snort would drop AP. I suspect the driver sees the card is now in promiscuous mode and decides it needs to reset the card / AP association. Kinda weird. I do wifi sniffing w/ snort and kismet all the time. Kismet drops AP as expected. Snort never does.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] snort rule, rmkml |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] snort rule, Joel Esler |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Snort-users] Taking Down Wifi, James Lay |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-users] Taking Down Wifi, Quantum Scientific |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |