Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Snort-Users
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Snort-users] Diagnosing MySQL server has gone away messages

Subject: Re: [Snort-users] Diagnosing MySQL server has gone away messages
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:43:17 -0400
When snort logs to db, it takes resources away from inspecting traffic. Missing packets.

--
Joel Esler
Sent from the road.

On Aug 21, 2007, at 10:33 AM, bleh <mailbox.size.limit@gmail.com> wrote:

Can you explain what you mean by Snort "has to stop being an IDS"? If Snort is no longer an IDS when logging directly to a DB what is it?

> In order for Snort to do an insert, it has to stop being an IDS.
> Personally, I don't want my IDS to miss any packets, regardless of the
> extremely short amount of time it takes to do a DB insert. (Unless you
> have a very busy DB).
>
> Still would rather you use Barnyard and Unified.
>
> Joel
>
> Jason Haar wrote:
>> Joel Esler wrote:
>>> As a general recommendation for everyone on the list, Snort should never be logging directly to the DB.
>>>
>>>
>> Can you tell me why that is? I mean, surely directly accessing a DB
>> doesn't introduce much latency/load *unless* it continually generates
>> events?
>>
>> i.e. if a particular installation of snort only generates 1 event per
>> minute, is there really any difference between snort->mysql and
>> snort->barnyard?
>>
>> I could understand it being a problem if snort is having to queue up
>> events while INSERTs are going on, but if that are spaced many seconds
>> apart...?
>>
>
> --
>
>
> --
> joel esler | security consultant | Sourcefire | pgp is public
--- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>