Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-users] Sensor overload - Too much traffic for Snort box? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Sat, 9 Jun 2007 00:05:35 -0500 |
I will definitely try the tweaks Benjamin suggested. As far as monitoring goes, all that I use currently are perfmon stats and the associated perl script to generate the graphs every hour via cron. During a one hour graph period that I happened to choose at the time I was collecting the information to show here, the Mbit per sec graph shows a minimum of 30 up to 60 Mbit/sec averaging around 40Mbit/sec. The load average on the snort box never goes crazy after it fully initializes and reads all the rules, it stays well below 1.0, around 0.15 to 0.4 on average. Ray H. -----Original Message----- From: Fábio a.k.a Fósforo [mailto:fosforo@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 10:59 PM To: Ray H. Cc: snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Snort-users] Sensor overload - Too much traffic for Snort box? I would recommend to install a network/process monitoring tool like monit (http://www.tildeslash.com/monit/) or zabbix (i've never tried it), and like Benjamin Smal propose, see which parameter from /proc to change after reading the reports. []s On 6/8/07, Ray H. <snort@melray.us> wrote:
Having some trouble with dropped packets. Wondering if my snort box is
under
powered or if I have my monitor session setup incorrectly, or something
I'm
just overlooking. Any help would be greatly appreciated. I've tried to include all relevant information pertaining to my issue with dropped packets.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] Sensor overload - Too much traffic for Snort box?, FÃbio a.k.a FÃsforo |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] Sensor overload - Too much traffic for Snort box?, Matthew Watchinski |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Snort-users] Sensor overload - Too much traffic for Snort box?, FÃbio a.k.a FÃsforo |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-users] Sensor overload - Too much traffic for Snort box?, Matthew Watchinski |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |