Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | [Snort-users] Hardware/Filtering for 1Gbps |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 25 May 2007 11:47:07 -0400 |
Hi
I want to run Snort and Ntop in a 1Gbps link (usage is 50%-60%) with a network tap that replicates all the trafic in various ports. I have 2 servers with Xeon 3,2 dual core (1066 Mhz FSB), 2 Gb of RAM (533 Mhz), RAID 1 of sata drives and Intel 85563 dual port Gb ethernet.
I want do distribute the load on the two servers. Can i do this efficiently by analyzing disctinct rules/ip/port on each server? or, is it better to get a device that do the load balancing? is the hardware enough?
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Snort-users] not your typical : BAD-TRAFFIC tcp port 0 traffic portscanning?, Michael Scheidell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] not your typical : BAD-TRAFFIC tcp port 0 traffic portscanning?, Richard Bejtlich |
| Previous by Thread: | [Snort-users] not your typical : BAD-TRAFFIC tcp port 0 traffic portscanning?, Michael Scheidell |
| Next by Thread: | [Snort-users] problem starting snort..kindly help, pearl carlo |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |