Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Snort-Users
[Top] [All Lists]

[Snort-users] non-standard-protocol : BAD-TRAFFIC IP Proto 103 PIM

Subject: [Snort-users] non-standard-protocol : BAD-TRAFFIC IP Proto 103 PIM
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:21:56 -0400
Hi all,

I am seeing loads (like 90% of all events) of these events showing up on one of 
my Snort sensors.  I have looked at the description here - 
http://www.snort.org/pub-bin/sigs.cgi?sid=2189 - and I looked at the rule 
definition and it appears to match simply on the existence of IP protocol 103 
as distinct from any payload within it.

I see the traffic coming from two known Cisco routers on the subnet I'm 
monitoring and the traffic is destined for 224.0.0.13 which is the multicast 
address for PIM - http://www.networksorcery.com/enp/protocol/pim.htm  I have 
also I have seen it on other sites and subnets on the network I am monitoring, 
so I guess whatever function is causing this traffic to originate from the 
router is used across the organisation.

In order to make the output from snort a little more readable (and because it 
is matching on the protocol and not the payload) I have disabled this rule.  I 
know the protocol in question is a routing-related protocol, but does anyone 
have any views or explanation on the normal use of this protocol ?

Thanks,

David
===========================================
David Ryan
IT Security Engineer, Global IT Security
Quintiles, Global IT - Infrastructure, QDUB

david.ryan@quintiles.com
v:  +353-1-819-5186, GMT+0
m: +353-87-124-9108
===========================================




**********************  IMPORTANT--PLEASE READ  ************************
This electronic message, including its attachments, is COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL
and may contain PROPRIETARY or LEGALLY PRIVILEGED information.  If you are 
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, disclosure,
copying, or distribution of this message or any of the information included
in it is unauthorized and strictly prohibited.  If you have received this
message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and
permanently delete this message and its attachments, along with any copies
thereof. If this electronic message contains a zipped attachment and you do
not have a decompression tool, you may download unZIP (free of cost) from:
http://www.mk-net-work.com/us/uz/unzip.htm. Alternatively, you may request
that the attachment be resent in an uncompressed format.        Thank you. 
************************************************************************

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>