On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 14:50 -0400, Paul Melson wrote:
Hey Joel and anyone else that has any more ideas, I am still experiencing
performance issues with this sensor. I built 2.6.1.4 and added
'search-method ac-bnfa' to snort.conf and have seen no performance change.
I tried building with or without the dynamic engine and processors and that
doesn't seem to make a difference, either. Any additional ideas? What
could I be missing here? I can run on 2.6.0.2 for now, but I'd like to know
that I have an upgrade path.
If performance is more important that the slightly higher accuracy in
alerts, why not run an older version of Snort? (like 2.4.x) No need to
always HAVE the latest versions of software. I still use some software
from the late nineties because it still works great and gives me what I
need (interestingly, a lot of these are less bloated and more stable
that newer versions of the same or similar products.... hmmmmm....)
Cheers,
Frank
--
It is said that the Internet is a public utility. As such, it is best
compared to a sewer. A big, fat pipe with a bunch of crap sloshing
against your ports.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
