Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-users] SnortAV? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 29 Dec 2006 08:32:00 -0500 |
Agreed. I guess what I'm looking for are options to further increase the intelligence of our current IDS implementation without throwing $100k at the problem for a full blown completely commercial IDS/IPS/SIM/SIEM or whatever the hot acronym is these days. Thanks for the info. John. -----Original Message----- From: jrhendri@maine.rr.com [mailto:jrhendri@maine.rr.com] Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 7:30 PM To: purplebag Cc: John Hally; snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Snort-users] SnortAV? I would agree that testing a host after the fact is inherently prone to error. Does anyone know of any effort to integrate IDS with scanner output to achieve a (potentially more accurate) result? Something like doing daily nessus scans and tailoring snort output to alert for systems that were (potentially) vulnerable as of the last scan could be beneficial. Or you could just tune your IDS based on human intelligence and *patch* your systems based on nessus output :-) Ramblings... Jim ----- Original Message ----- From: purplebag <purplebag@gmail.com> Date: Thursday, December 28, 2006 7:07 pm Subject: Re: [Snort-users] SnortAV? To: John Hally <JHally@epnet.com> Cc: snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
From the web page"Active alert verification is a technique designed to reduce the false positive rate of IDSs by actively probing for a vulnerability associated with detected attacks. If the vulnerability corresponding to a detected attack is found to exist in the host or network against which the attack was directed, the alert is generated, invoking any logging and response functions as normal. If, however, the vulnerability is determined not to exist, the alert is considered a false positive and is suppressed." This is a lot like what Psionic ( now cisco ) does - http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/corp_102202.html. What is the first thing attackers do after compromising a host? They patch the flaw they entered through in order to maintain control and not lose the system in the same manner. Automated attack tools and kits make this process extremely expedient and are likely to result in the real events being suppressed by the infrastructure you trust to let you know about the problem. I've been witness to this failure on many occasion and can only recommend against any reliance on this and similar methodologies. The approach is fundamentally flawed from a security perspective. Nothing about the target host, as reported by itself, can be trusted post attack; if there were a real compromise. On 12/28/06, John Hally <JHally@epnet.com> wrote:Hello All, I stumbled upon SnortAV recently, which looks to be integrationof Nessus toattempt to verify alerts and actual vulnerabilities to raisepriority. Itlooks as though the project is stalled. Is that the case? Hasanyone hadany experience with it? It seems like a really cool concept,almost a poorman's RNA. Thoughts? Thanks! -------------------------------------------------------------------------Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance toshare youropinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earncash> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV>_______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users-- Purple Bag Society of the Crown -------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] SnortAV?, Paul Schmehl |
|---|---|
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Snort-users] SnortAV?, Paul Schmehl |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |