Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Snort-Users
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Snort-users] SnortAV?

Subject: Re: [Snort-users] SnortAV?
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:19:20 -0500
From the web page

"Active alert verification is a technique designed to reduce the false
positive rate of IDSs by actively probing for a vulnerability
associated with detected attacks. If the vulnerability corresponding
to a detected attack is found to exist in the host or network against
which the attack was directed, the alert is generated, invoking any
logging and response functions as normal. If, however, the
vulnerability is determined not to exist, the alert is considered a
false positive and is suppressed."

This is a lot like what Psionic ( now cisco ) does -
http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/corp_102202.html.

What is the first thing attackers do after compromising a host? They
patch the flaw they entered through in order to maintain control and
not lose the system in the same manner.

Automated attack tools and kits make this process extremely expedient
and are likely to result in the real events being suppressed by the
infrastructure you trust to let you know about the problem. I've been
witness to this failure on many occasion and can only recommend
against any reliance on this and similar methodologies.

The approach is fundamentally flawed from a security perspective.
Nothing about the target host, as reported by itself, can be trusted
post attack; if there were a real compromise.


On 12/28/06, John Hally <JHally@epnet.com> wrote:




Hello All,

I stumbled upon SnortAV recently, which looks to be integration of Nessus to
attempt to verify alerts and actual vulnerabilities to raise priority.  It
looks as though the project is stalled.  Is that the case?  Has anyone had
any experience with it?  It seems like a really cool concept, almost a poor
man's RNA.

Thoughts?

Thanks!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV

_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users




-- 
Purple Bag
Society of the Crown

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>