Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-users] rules downloads and scalability |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 18 Sep 2006 12:52:33 -0500 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
I suppose Sourcefire's thinking is, which I think makes sense, say you download new rules at 9am and a new worm or pretty nasty exploit surfaces at noon. Then, new Snort signatures are released at 3:00pm. If it were limited to once a day, you wouldn't be able to grab those rules until 12:01am the next day :/
But then again, you wouldn't be able to get them that quickly unless you were a VRT paid subscriber.. so that doesn't make sense.. :/ hmm.. I can't answer that one..
:-)
Ok, here's another idea :) You have several Snort management solutions, each with its own method of managing Snort rules (we've got several customers like this) where you use your oink code to download rules for Snort management solution A and then you need to do the same for Snort management solution B. You can't download rules for B until the next day, so B will always be 1 day behind.
Problem solved.
That about does it for me :) I suppose the answer to your question is, why not? Why tie people's hands more than you actually need to.. if every 15 minutes addresses the issue for Sourcefire, why do it longer like 24 hours?
Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
p7sjOmIcUTiMe.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] error: log_tcpdump TcpdumpInitlogefile():no error, David Lantz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Snort-users] Inaugural Snort Virtual Users Group Meeting Sept. 28, Mike Guiterman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Snort-users] rules downloads and scalability, Eric Hines |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-users] rules downloads and scalability, Bristol, Gary L. |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |