Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-users] what is the difference in memory models (search-method lowmem) mean? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:30:30 -0400 |
Jason Haar wrote:
I have been putting off upgrading our snort network from 2.4X to 2.6 for ages because we run a fairly full ruleset and I saw memory usage leap between the two versions. e.g. I just tried out 2.6.0.2 and our snort installs hit 850MB RAM per process - owch! (under RHE4). This compares with 240MB under 2.4X However, if I enable the line "config detection: search-method lowmem", memory utilization under 2.6 falls waaaaay down to <100MB. Sounds too good to be true. What am I missing out on by doing such an action? And if this sort of memory usage is expected, is everyone just putting in 4G RAM to deal with this sort of thing? Thanks
Below is a cut and paste from a mail Marc Norton sent to the snort-devel list. [0] It should make it more clear.
In 2.6.0 we use the ac method, it is the fastest, but does consume more memory and takes some initial resources to build the DFA it uses. The acs/ac-banded/and ac-sparsebands/mwm/lowmem methods each use less memory, than the ac or ac-std methods. However, we do not recommend mwm as it poses some DOS opportunities with repeated patterns. The low mem method is about 20% slower than the faster methods, but uses very little memory and very little initial resources. Of couse you can also revert to the ac-std method that has been in use since 2.0 as well. It's startup is about 3x faster than the other ac methods. Memory usage most to least is: ac-std ac ac-banded ac-sparsebands mwm acs lowmem startup processing most to least is most ----- ac ac-banded ac-sparsebands acs moderate --------- ac-std very little --------- mwm lowmem
[0] - http://marc2.theaimsgroup.com/?l=snort-devel&m=115627559410302&w=3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Snort-users] what is the difference in memory models (search-method lowmem) mean?, Jason Haar |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Snort-users] email dups generated by sourceforge at the moment, Jason Haar |
| Previous by Thread: | [Snort-users] what is the difference in memory models (search-method lowmem) mean?, Jason Haar |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-users] what is the difference in memory models (search-method lowmem) mean?, Jason Haar |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |