Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | [Snort-users] Request for urgent help. |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:00:07 +1000 (EST) |
Respected sir
I am am new to use this snort. I have no idea how to use this. I need some
information regarding this question. If i dont do this i am gonna fail the
subject. The university did not provided any guidence on how to use the snort.
I dont know anything. Please some one help me out.
You are a security specialist working for ABC Incorporated. ABC use SNORT as
their NIDS which protects their IP sub-network being in the range of
203.40.27.128 ? 203.40.27.255.
(a)
A recent security vulnerability has been found
in OpenSSH. A junior staff member within the security team developed a new
SNORT rule to detect this attack. Your supervisor has asked you to check the
work of the junior staff member to ensure there are no errors in the SNORT
rule.
The security vulnerability is described as follows:
A buffer overflow has been detected in the OpenSSH server. Exploits have
been released and exhibit the following characteristics:
· A payload positioned 100 bytes from the start of the data with a
string message ?You are mine?
· After the above payload, there is a variable field of 4 bytes
specifying a return address. These 4 bytes can be any value.
· Following the variable 4 bytes return address is the exploit code
signature given in HEX as AB 8F 23 8A BC 92
The rule should:
· when triggered, drop and then log the packet only.
· detect attacks from inside and outside their private network.
· include a message with the log entry as ?OpenSSH exploit attempt?.
· include a reference to the CVE number CAN-2006-06-3318
· Have a classification of attempted-admin
The rule written by the junior staff member is as follows:
alert udp !203.40.27.0/24 any -> 203.40.27.128/24 23 (msg: ?OpenSSH exploit
attempt?; cve:CAN-2006-06-3318; classtype: attempted-admin; content: ?You are
mine?; depth: 12; offset:100; content: ?AB 8F 23 8A BC 92?; depth:6; offset:4;)
The rule above contains 8 syntax or logic errors. Your task is to review the
above rule and identify these errors which may prevent the rule from detecting
legitimate attacks, or will cause false positives. For all the mistakes,
identify the error, explain why it is wrong, and then fix the error.
EXAMPLE:
Here is a sample rule with a mistake in it.
alert udp any 53 -> any 53 (msg: ?DNS attack?; content: ?XYZ?;)
Here is an example of the solution format:
Error 1: alert udp any 53 ->
The source port is given as 53, however requests to a DNS server from a
client will use ephemeral ports, and therefore should be given as any. To
correct this mistake, the rule should read:
Solution 1: alert udp any any -> any 53
Make sure to:
· Number each of the errors you find as shown above (ie. Error 1)
· Provide a copy of the portion of the rule which contains the error.
Be sure to include keywords around the error to make it clear which part of
the rule you are referring to. If you prefer, for each error, re-write the
entire rule and highlight the error (see next point)
· Highlight in some way the specific part of the rule you are
referring. In the example above, the source port number ?53? was underlined.
If you do not make it clear which part of the rule is incorrect, no marks can
be given.
· Be sure to include a clear explanation of why the rule was wrong
and how it should be fixed
· Re-write the portion of the rule again with the correction included
and highlighted (ie underlined)
MARKING CRITERIA:
Each correctly identified error with a clear explanation and a correct fix
for the error will be assigned a ¼ mark. No part marks will be assigned, so if
you correctly identify the error, but do not provide an appropriate fix or your
explanation of the error is vague or incorrect, no marks will be assigned.
(b)
(4 marks) Your supervisor asks you to
implement a SNORT IDS rule to detect and alert all attempts at exploiting the
vulnerability as described below for any computer on the internal network. He
then asks you to write an explanation of each component of the rule, so other
security specialists in your team can see how your rule is written. The rule
should notify the security team when an attempt is made using the message: ?NEW
PING O? DEATH EXPLOIT ATTEMPT?. Be sure to allocate an appropriate sid value
and a revision number for your new rule, the appropriate class type for this
attack, and that you include the appropriate CVE id and a nessus vulnerability
scanner id as described below.
A new atomic denial of service attack has been discovered. It behaves
similarly to the Ping o? death exploit that caused great chaos many years ago ?
once the victim?s computer receives the exploit packet, it will immediately
crash. Thus, it has been named ?New Ping o? Death? and has a CVE of
?2006-0721? and nessus id of ?21091?. The attack is a single ping request with
an invalid code field. Current variants of the exploit have been using a code
field value of ?1001? (expressed here in binary), however your rule should
detect all ping requests with an invalid code field value. Furthermore, to
exploit the vulnerability the type of service value should be set to ?Minimise
delay?.
An example of how to layout your solution follows:
var HOME_NET 138.77.23.0/16
var EXTERNAL_NET !138.77.23.0/16
Your explanation of the above in italics
drop udp $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HOME_NET 993
Your explanation of the above, and so on?
An example explanation for a SNORT rule option:
content: ?USER root?; nocase;
The content of the packet must contain the string ?USER root? to be matched.
Furthermore, the nocase option specifies that the string ?USER root? should be
matched case insensitively. In other words, it will match that string whether
in upper, lower or mixed capitalisation.
---------------------------------
On Yahoo!7
360°: Your own space to share what you want with who you want!
---------------------------------
On Yahoo!7
Coming soon: Celebrity Survivor - 11 celebrities, 25 days, unlimited drama------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] rule does not alert from nmap, Matt Kettler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] Request for urgent help., Joel Esler |
| Previous by Thread: | [Snort-users] rule does not alert from nmap, repniksz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-users] Request for urgent help., Joel Esler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |