Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-users] Pass rule vs. threshold/suppression |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 28 Jul 2006 08:53:02 -0400 |
Frank Knobbe wrote:
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 12:04 -0400, Joel Esler wrote:Pass rules and Suppression are pretty much processed at the same time, however, suppression does not require rule ordering, so it's preferred your use Suppression.Is that an accurate statement? When a pass rule matches, the whole packet/stream is ignored, meaning that any other rules are not matched (early out). It is my understanding that suppression rules only become effective after a signature match is successful, and if suppressed with that SID, will not cause an alert *with that SID*. However, other SIDs may still alert, so the packet/stream is getting evaluated by other rules. So I can't see them being equal. In regards to performance it appears that pass rules are faster (since no further matching occurs), which of course means that one has to be careful using pass rules as they might squelch other rules you might want an alert on.
Pass rules prevent any alerts from firing for the _packet(s)_ the pass rule matches but they must be evaluated with all of the other rules. The same performance considerations exist for pass rules as do alert rules and the same impact is had as a result. A suppression on the other hand does not add any rules and prevents the results of a rule from creating an alert.
At least I recall that working like this at some point in time. Has that changed?
Early exist logic went away with the addition of the fast pattern matcher and multiple alerts per packet.
Regards, Frank ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Snort-users] oops speed.., 기병석 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Snort-users] http-tunnel rule, Thomas Werth |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Snort-users] Pass rule vs. threshold/suppression, Frank Knobbe |
| Next by Thread: | [Snort-users] Version 0.9 of OSSEC available., Daniel Cid |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |