Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-users] Pass rule vs. threshold/suppression |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 25 Jul 2006 21:54:19 +0300 |
"suppress gen_id xxx, sig_id xxx, track by_dst, ip xxx, track by_dst, ip xxx" It works for me. infact, you don't have to put /32 if you mean one addr. On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 09:37:47AM -0700, Jon Hart wrote:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 12:27:04PM -0400, Joel Esler wrote:Have you tested to see if this works?I tried this a week or so ago with 2.4.5. I was told it would work, but my initial testing showed that it did not work -- I'd still get alerts for that specific combination of sid, src and dest. I only spent a few minutes on this, but I recall seeing the threshold table being printed when snort starts and it only include. I just retested this and if a suppress rule has a by_src and by_dst, the one that appears last on the config line takes precedence: threshold.conf: suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 2925, track by_src, ip 1.2.3.4/32, track by_dst, ip 5.6.7.8/32 /var/log/messages: Jul 25 09:35:26 ids-box snort[6939]: | gen-id=1 sig-id=2925 tracking=dstip=5.6.7.8 mask=255.255.255.255 -jon ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] Pass rule vs. threshold/suppression, Frank Knobbe |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Snort-users] Version 0.9 of OSSEC available., Daniel Cid |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Snort-users] Pass rule vs. threshold/suppression, Jon Hart |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-users] Pass rule vs. threshold/suppression, Frank Knobbe |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |