Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-users] Pass rule vs. threshold/suppression |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 25 Jul 2006 12:09:04 -0500 |
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 12:04 -0400, Joel Esler wrote:
Pass rules and Suppression are pretty much processed at the same time, however, suppression does not require rule ordering, so it's preferred your use Suppression.
Is that an accurate statement? When a pass rule matches, the whole packet/stream is ignored, meaning that any other rules are not matched (early out). It is my understanding that suppression rules only become effective after a signature match is successful, and if suppressed with that SID, will not cause an alert *with that SID*. However, other SIDs may still alert, so the packet/stream is getting evaluated by other rules. So I can't see them being equal. In regards to performance it appears that pass rules are faster (since no further matching occurs), which of course means that one has to be careful using pass rules as they might squelch other rules you might want an alert on. At least I recall that working like this at some point in time. Has that changed? Regards, Frank -- It is said that the Internet is a public utility. As such, it is best compared to a sewer. A big, fat pipe with a bunch of crap sloshing against your ports.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] Pass rule vs. threshold/suppression, Jon Hart |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] Pass rule vs. threshold/suppression, nikns |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Snort-users] Pass rule vs. threshold/suppression, nikns |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-users] Pass rule vs. threshold/suppression, Jason |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |