Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-users] consensus on BASE |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 02 Jun 2006 10:18:37 +0100 |
Drew Burchett wrote:
I guess if BASE has one fatal flaw, there's no ability to see an IP conversation that triggered an alert. For example, if you see an ATTACK RESPONSE 403 FORBIDDEN alert, there's no good way to tell if it was malicious or if some dummy just typed in the wrong URL.
That's correct in that specific case, as Snort will only generate an alert for the 403 from the server and will not log packets preceeding that event. However, if you have rules to look out for dangerous inbound/request traffic, then you can get details of what was requested and what the server's response was. If Snort provides payload information, BASE will use it. You need to configure Snort to use an 'alert' output plugin, rather than a 'log' output plugin. Further to this, if you use FLoP between Snort and the database and use Snort's 'tag' directive on rules you're interested in, FLoP's 'getpacket' utility can rebuild the original alert plus subsequent tagged packets into a .pcap file that can be analysed using ethereal or whatever. I've patched my local installation of BASE to provide the option to download such a pcap file from the alert viewer. The patch was submitted to BASE a while back, but they don't seem to have seen fit to include it just yet.
Drew Burchett
Best Regards, Alex. -- Alex Butcher: Security & Integrity, Personal Computer Systems Group Information Systems and Computing GPG Key ID: F9B27DC9 GPG Fingerprint: D62A DD83 A0B8 D174 49C4 2849 832D 6C72 F9B2 7DC9 _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Snort-users] consensus on BASE, James Affeld |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] consensus on BASE, Alex Butcher |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [Snort-users] consensus on BASE, James Affeld |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-users] consensus on BASE, Alex Butcher |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |