Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-users] consensus on BASE |
|---|---|
| Date: | Sat, 27 May 2006 09:06:17 -0600 |
The Sguil client runs fine on any OS that supports tcl. Using the ActiveState [0] packages, it's actually easier to run the client on Windows than it is Linux. ActiveState also has packages available for AIX, HP-UX, Linux, Mac OS X (both for PowerPC and x86), and Solaris. Here is an old post on Richard's TaoSecurity blog [1] that explains the installation process.
Bammkkkk
[0] http://www.activestate.com/Products/ActiveTcl/ [1] http://taosecurity.blogspot.com/2003/07/want-to-become-f8-monkey-my-friend.html
While I can agree with most of what was said here, I can see one flaw with Sguil. I don't run any Linux boxes with a GUI frontend, and I don't have the resources to load one just to run Sguil. I'm using BASE to help fine tune Snort as it's good to help weed out false positives and for a good running overview of what is happening in realtime. I combine that with Snortalog for daily overviews of my data and then use other programs to provide email and/or pager alerts on events that I feel are important enough to draw my immediate attention.
I guess if BASE has one fatal flaw, there's no ability to see an IP conversation that triggered an alert. For example, if you see an ATTACK RESPONSE 403 FORBIDDEN alert, there's no good way to tell if it was malicious or if some dummy just typed in the wrong URL.
Drew Burchett United Systems & Software http://www.united-systems.com Phone: (270)527-3293 Fax: (270)527-3132
> -----Original Message----- > From: snort-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:snort-users- > admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Paul Schmehl > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:54 PM > Cc: snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Snort-users] consensus on BASE > > John Newman wrote: > > Is the consensus that BASE is the best web front-end for snort out there > > (and I mean free, open source stuff)? What are people's experiences > > with sguil (which I realize is not web based). > > > > thanks, > > > I think Base is probably the most popular open source front-end > (although I don't have any data to back that up.) It's certainly easy > to install and use. The problem with Base is that it gives you a > sliding window of your events data, which tends to obscure real-time > events from view unless they are large enough to draw attention (or you > just happen to notice them._ So, it's good for summarizing what's going > on, but not as good for real-time analysis of discrete events. > > Sguil is very difficult to install. It requires quite a bit of > preparation and installation of ancilliary apps to make it work. (I'm > trying to solve that on FreeBSD by developing ports for it that take > care of all the dependencies.) That's a consequence of the decision to > use tcl as the programming language, since it's not commonly installed > on most platforms. (It also uses some other apps which are not so > common; sancp, p0f, tcpdump > > Once it's installed and configured (which is also a bit of work and > requires a clear understanding of what you're doing), it provides a > completely different, more detailed look at the data, in real time. > It's easy to pick out events that need immediate followup and drill down > into packets to see what's really going on. > > So, I would say, Base is good for folks new to snort and especially new > to admining OSes, and sguil is good for folks who clearly understand > what they're doing and want as much information about events as they can > get. > > -- > Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) > Adjunct Information Security Officer > The University of Texas at Dallas > http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
-- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner and is believed to be clean.
------------------------------------------------------- All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk! Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid7521&bid$8729&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?listsnort-users
-- sguil - The Analyst Console for NSM http://sguil.sf.net
------------------------------------------------------- All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk! Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd_______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Snort-users] consensus on BASE, Michael Scheidell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] consensus on BASE, Bamm Visscher |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [Snort-users] consensus on BASE, Drew Burchett |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [Snort-users] consensus on BASE, Michael Scheidell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |