Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | [Snort-users] Snort dies |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 23 May 2006 12:03:24 -0300 |
Hi, I'm doing my first snort installation. I installed it without problems and
configured it to log alerts via syslog. Everything seems OK, but after running
for a while it dies, sending the following message to syslog:
May 23 10:49:39 localhost kernel: eth0.7: dev_set_promiscuity(master, -1)
May 23 10:49:39 localhost kernel: device eth0.7 left promiscuous mode
This seems to occur whenever the following traffic is detected
May 23 10:49:39 localhost snort[8729]: [119:15:1] (http_inspect) OVERSIZE
REQUEST-URI DIRECTORY <eth0.7> {TCP} xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:59635 -> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:80
This traffic originates in my internal network and goes to MSN services like
Hotmail and WebMessenger.
I'm using Snort 2.4.4 with the current ruleset, running on a Red Hat Linux box
with kernel version 2.4.20-8. I'm also using logsurfer to scan the syslog file
and send alerts via mail. The NIC is an Intel PRO1000 GT with VLAN suport
enabled in the kernel; it has 7 subinterfaces but I'm running snort in only one
of them. The box is also running tcpdump in another subinterface.
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Snort-users] Mail Notification Fail, Michael Scheidell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Snort-users] event database size, John Newman |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [Snort-users] Mail Notification Fail, Michael Scheidell |
| Next by Thread: | [Snort-users] event database size, John Newman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |