Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | [Snort-users] Re: stream4: Stealth activity |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 28 Apr 2006 10:30:57 -0500 |
On 0, Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu> wrote:
ok, this is gid 111 and sid 1 right?Yes, that's correct. The msg portion of the alert is "spp_stream4: Stealth Activity Detected"
So it's basically a discovery method. (And I see that I missed an important point, which is that the stealth activity could be incomplete sessions (SYN, but no ACK, FIN/PUSH/URG without a SYN, etc.) rather than inconsistent sequence numbers.)
Yes, there are also other situations in which stream4 could generate events on too, Xmas scans or Null scans for example and these have their own gid:sid combos. Stream4 has the opportunity to tell you about protocol anomalies as a by-product of reconstructing stream data. The same goes for frag3 and the other pre-processors.
What you would ideally be able to do with traffic like this is bypass a firewall. More info on stealth scanning here: http://www.snort.org/docs/faq/1Q05/node43.htmlHere's the problem from an analyst's POV. If we get these alerts from seemingly random addresses, we can't be certain that it's really a discovery attack as opposed to a faulty NIC or misconfigured stack or application. So, do we report them?
That's hard to say. Could be a question of wether or not it's worth the effort given the resources at hand.
The recent activity seems much more suspicious. We're seeing alerts from multiple nodes in a /24, making the possibility of randomness seem remote and the likelihood of a deliberate attack much higher. So, do we report them? We report all portscans that trigger more than 1000 alerts, but most people understand what those are. If we send a complaint letter to an abuse@ address with a "spp_stream4: Stealth Activity Detected" alert, they're less likely to know what we're complaining about and therefore less likely to follow up, because they won't know what to look for on the suspect host.
Right, the explanation of possible causes would need to accompany the complaint which might lead to a better response.
I guess, when we see what appears to be coordinated activity, we can make a more persuasive case that the foreign network needs to take action, so that's probably what we should concentrate on.
Sounds like a good plan of action.
Thanks for your input, Nigel.
No problem, glad I could help.
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
Nigel Houghton Research Engineer Sourcefire Inc.
Vulnerability Research Team
There is no theory of evolution, just a list
of creatures Vin Diesel allows to live.
-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Snort-users] Re: stream4: Stealth activity, Paul Schmehl |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [Snort-users] Re: Rules for Snort 2.6 RC1, Jason Monroe |
| Previous by Thread: | [Snort-users] Re: stream4: Stealth activity, Paul Schmehl |
| Next by Thread: | [Snort-users] April 7th Chicago2600 Meeting Information, Steven McGrath |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |