Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Snort-Users
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Snort-users] How should alerts be interpreted? hacker's_machine ->

Subject: Re: [Snort-users] How should alerts be interpreted? hacker's_machine -> victim's_machine?
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 15:48:16 -0400
I suggest that you define all your variables inside of the snort.conf. There are many to configure. -h is only one.

J

Patrick S. Harper wrote:
That is also assuming that you have all your variables set correctly.

-----Original Message-----
From: snort-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
[mailto:snort-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Palula Brasil
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 1:12 PM
To: snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Snort-users] How should alerts be interpreted? hacker's_machine ->
victim's_machine?

Ok! Alerts are workin fine. But indeed there is another problem.
Here is the problem: the alert file has these. [**] [122:7:0] (portscan) TCP Filtered Portsweep [**]
04/12-22:30:29.305031 x.x.x.x:port -> 38.119.49.39
PROTO255 TTL:0 TOS:0x0 ID:5901 IpLen:20 DgmLen:162 DF
and...
[**] [119:15:1] (http_inspect) OVERSIZE REQUEST-URI DIRECTORY [**]
04/12-23:14:22.648030 x.x.x.x:port -> 66.165.172.181:80
TCP TTL:64 TOS:0x0 ID:30828 IpLen:20 DgmLen:1452 DF
***A**** Seq: 0x3B8C6DA9 Ack: 0x7AAF4300 Win: 0x5AC TcpLen: 32
TCP Options (3) => NOP NOP TS: 54649465 770359521
But the thing is that x.x.x.x:port is my machines IP and port. Looks like
it's gone mad and is doing totally random port scans and http inspects on
whatever machines.
According to snort docs, the correct interpretation for these alerts is:
hacker's machine -> victim's machines
Has my machine gone mad and is making victims out of a sudden? Home network
( -h x.x.x.x/x) has been defined, by the way.
Thanks! :-)





------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>