Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | [Snort-users] tcp_decode logging |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 13 Apr 2006 11:43:51 -0700 |
Recently i've been recieving lots of 'tcp experimental options' alerts through the tcp_decoder. I am using barnyard w/ unified logging however the tcp options are not being logged. Is this by design? I can't find any firm answers. I'd like to enable this if I can. And since this isn't being logged I can't find the cause, I'm assuming it's a false positive though. Random packet captures show the options such as: | 02 04 05 78 01 01 04 02 4c 0a 00 40 01 01 0a 70 01 1e 00 05 01 00 | which ethereal decodes as MSS 1400 NOP NOP SACK Unknown 0x4c NOP EOL But I'm only assuming this is the bad packet since none of the flagged packets are being logged by snort... Is it recommended that I disable this alert w/ config disable_tcpopt_experimental_alerts? Still, I'd prefer to fix or understand the issue before disabling the alert. What are the general causes of these experimental options? tia ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd_______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Snort-users] How should alerts be interpreted? hacker's_machine -> victim's_machine?, Palula Brasil |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [Snort-users] How should alerts be interpreted? hacker's_machine -> victim's_machine?, Patrick S. Harper |
| Previous by Thread: | [Snort-users] How should alerts be interpreted? hacker's_machine -> victim's_machine?, Palula Brasil |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-users] tcp_decode logging, Will Metcalf |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |