Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-devel] Re: [Snort-users] Running SNORT in low end device |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:26:09 +0000 (GMT) |
Hi all,
Thanks for the replies.
I am trying to put the SNORT-INLINE code and rule database in NAND flash.My
NAND flash size is 32MB.
I am using micro controller linux.So there is no question of swapping Terry.
For Gulfie question :
My processor is MIPS based and speed is 177MHz.Great to your memory power.
How much memory is required to run Snort-inline ?
Thanks in advance,
Aravind.
Jason <security@brvenik.com> wrote: Try playing with these settings
use lowmem for pattern matcher
use small stream flush intervals
reduce stream memory
reduce frag memory
reduce flow memory
reduce flowbits
reduce flow depth for http_inspect
reassemble client only streams
turn off the bo preprocessor
turn off portscan
turn off a bunch of rules that you probably do not need
With such low memory usage you will likely hit a point of thrashing if
you try to handle anything more than a few systems using 1M of pipe but
it would work for a home system ok.
Terry Vernon wrote:
I run a similar setup you mentioned with a Pentium 2 266mhz, over 320MB of ram. My snort usually is hogging up 71MB on my 10/100 home network, which is a bridge. That all runs great but you're asking for a lot out of 64MB. You could try to get by on swap space if your hard disk is decent. You can do this if you find a way to expand the memory. If you can't and you want to be McGyver about the idea you could try to put your swap partition on the faster accessing flash memory. Try to log to the slower hard drive. -Terry -----Original Message----- From: snort-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:snort-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Gulfie Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 8:38 AM To: aravind babu Cc: snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net; snort-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Snort-devel] Re: [Snort-users] Running SNORT in low end device On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 12:29:40PM +0000, aravind babu wrote:Hi all, I am planning to run Snort/Snort-Inline on the following Hardware configuration. Processor : 177MHz RAM : 64MB NAND FLASH : 128MB (Where Snort code will exist.Also signatures)Okay. What processor? Is it a i386 based procesosr, or some wierd arm embedded thing, or the MIPS thing you were working on in Dec 2003?Is it worth to do this?I am planning to build a appliance which will have functionalities of Firewall,VPN,and IDS/IPS.But the question is why? and where are you going to put it? It could be a wonderfull solution, or a very bad solution depending on the problems that are being addressed.Please tell me your views on this.Snort without rules, is about 8 Megabytes in core (on the machine sitting before me), with the default ruleset it's up to 40 Megabytes, and with the VRT_PR rules, community rules and Bleeding edge snort rules, you're up to maybe 60 Megabytes. So you'r going to have to config the ruleset way way down, same thing for the preprocessors. Other interesting questions. Where are the alerts going to go? Back down the vpn connection? You'll be able to do it, just make sure that your expectations are set correctly. 177MHz is _reallly_ slow, and 64 MB is _really_ small. If you are looking to IDS/IPS over a modem vpn connection, it'll probibly be fast enough. If you are looking to IDS/IPS over a 10/100 ethernet port(s)... The answer is probibly not as much. That being said. It could be a nifty little device, to send along with peoples laptops as a network condom. -gulfieThanks in advance, Aravind.------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ Snort-devel mailing list Snort-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-devel ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ Snort-devel mailing list Snort-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-devel
Send instant messages to your online friends http://in.messenger.yahoo.com
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] Running SNORT in low end device, Gulfie |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Snort-users] Preprocessor port scan ignore host, Joshua Brown |
| Previous by Thread: | [Snort-users] Running SNORT in low end device, aravind babu |
| Next by Thread: | [Snort-users] Preprocessor port scan ignore host, Joshua Brown |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |