Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | [Snort-users] (spp_frag3) Short fragment, possible DoS attempt |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 6 Dec 2005 10:22:55 -0600 |
After upgrading to version 2.4.3 we are getting alot of (spp_frag3) Short fragment, possible DoS Attempt alerts. These alerts are only between two internal hosts (a Redhat AS server and an old Digital Alpha). The alerts are being triggered by NFS traffic between the two hosts. Since this seems to be a preprocessor engine that is detecting this traffic, can snort.conf be modified to ignore these packets and how would I go about doing this? Thanks In advance Robert Graham
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] bpf filter versus "config ignore_ports", Dirk Geschke |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Snort-users] Can I automatically include rules?, oink |
| Previous by Thread: | [Snort-users] bpf filter versus "config ignore_ports", Martin Olsson |
| Next by Thread: | [Snort-users] Can I automatically include rules?, oink |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |