Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-users] portscan preprocessor and external net |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 29 Nov 2005 19:23:47 +0100 (CET) |
Matt Kettler <mkettler@evi-inc.com> ha scritto:
Generally speaking, you want to do the opposite. You want to ignore your
subnet,
and no others.
We need to detect only home hosts that make portscan to any (compromised
hosts) because we have a lot of scanning from external.
Now, i must subnet all internet address? There is no way to make a !$HOME_NET
without writing ALL internet address?
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger: chiamate gratuite in tutto il mondo
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] portscan preprocessor and external net, Matt Kettler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] Libnet v1.1 vs libnet v1.0.2a, Jeff Nathan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Snort-users] portscan preprocessor and external net, Matt Kettler |
| Next by Thread: | [Snort-users] Any issues with dup packets on snort?, Jason Haar |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |