Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-users] Rules not matching, or matching without logic |
|---|---|
| Date: | Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:30:08 +0600 |
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 10:45:49 -0500 Jeff Kell <jeff-kell@utc.edu> wrote:
Vanja Hrustic wrote: Is the Cat4500 port set as a monitor destination? For a 4500 you need a monitor session setup properly, and you need to insure that the session includes the traffic you are trying to snort. Typically this is the switch uplink. For example, if your uplink is on gig1/1 and your eth1 is connected to gig2/24, you need something like:monitor session 1 source interface Gi1/1 monitor session 1 destination interface Gi2/21
Not in the office right now, but I think it was setup in this way (another guy set it up, so I'm not 100% sure).
That will get you copies of traffic over the uplink, but of course it will not see traffic between ports on the same switch unless you're monitoring an SVI or vlan that includes that traffic. You didn't give details about your setup, but it certainly sounds like the monitor session is incorrect.
I do monitor uplink, and I do get all the traffic, but I'll check the exact setup tomorrow. Thanks for the details anyway.
You don't have stream reassembly enabled in your configuration. You're also using "flow:" keywords in some of your rules, yet your flow preprocessor configuration is commented out. Consequently, flow: won't work.
<snip>
Again, you don't have flow enabled.
<snip>
The 2nd rule doesn't use flow. And you typing 'console' during a telnet session won't be reassembled, so it won't be seen in one contiguous packet.
Yes, the pasted rules have preprocessors disabled, but that's just AFTER I've tried every single combination. They were all enabled before, and I was just disabling them one by one, in hope that something will change. Thanks anyway. Vanja ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit: http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] Rules not matching, or matching without logic, Jeff Kell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Snort-users] Creating a simple rule., Paul Halliday |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Snort-users] Rules not matching, or matching without logic, Jeff Kell |
| Next by Thread: | [Snort-users] Creating a simple rule., Paul Halliday |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |