Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-users] No clue? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:09:37 -0800 (PST) |
Thanks.
Now, I changed these (in threshold.conf) to:
suppress gen_id 100, sig_id 1, track by_src, ip
10.1.10.6/32
suppress gen_id 100, sig_id 2, track by_src, ip
10.1.10.6/32
suppress gen_id 100, sig_id 3, track by_src, ip
10.1.10.6/32
and also in snort.conf I have:
preprocessor sfportscan: proto { all } \
memcap { 10000000 } \
sense_level { low } \
ignore_scanners { 10.1.10.6 }
preprocessor portscan-ignorehosts: 10.1.10.6
But, I still get these alerts. Totally out of mind
now, any ideas?
Thanks,
John
--- Eric Maheo <eric.maheo@appliedwatch.com> wrote:
like it's a cidr, I will try: suppress gen_id 100, sig_id 1, track by_src, ip 10.1.10.6/32 On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 07:53 -0800, John Friedman wrote:Thanks for your help.did you enable the include threshold.conf at the end of your snort.conf?YES! Also, I changed to suppress gen_id 100, sig_id 1, track by_src, ip 10.1.10.6 suppress gen_id 100, sig_id 2, track by_src, ip 10.1.10.6 suppress gen_id 100, sig_id 3, track by_src, ip 10.1.10.6 and sill with ignor_scanners statement. But, Istillget these alerts: ************************ ID < Signature > < Timestamp > < SourceAddress< Dest. Address > < Layer 4 Proto >#0-(2-11683) [snort]spp_portscanfrom 10.1.10.6: 1 connections across 1 hosts:TCP(1),UDP(0) 2005-11-16 10:50:39 10.1.10.6unknown IP #1-(2-11682) [snort]spp_portscanfrom 10.1.10.6: 1 connections across 1 hosts:TCP(1),UDP(0) 2005-11-16 10:49:59 10.1.10.6unknown IP #2-(2-11681) [snort]spp_portscanfrom 10.1.10.6: 1 connections across 1 hosts:TCP(1),UDP(0) 2005-11-16 10:49:18 10.1.10.6unknown IP ********************* any clue and I am totally lost. Any suggestions? Thanks, John --- Eric Maheo <eric.maheo@appliedwatch.com>wrote:Just my 2 cents.. did you enable the include threshold.conf at the end of your snort.conf? you can add a cidr but consult thesnort_manual.pdf.This manual is in your /doc of your sources. Download from snort.org and untargz your file and you will see this snort_manual.pdf in the /doc directory. At the page 83 you have your answer. ex: suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 1234, trackby_dst, ip10.1.0.0/24 On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 07:07 -0800, John Friedman wrote:Thanks for all suggestions and help that havebeengiven to me. Here is my config now: preprocessor sfportscan: proto { all } \ memcap { 10000000 } \ sense_level { low } \ ignore_scanners {[10.1.10.5,10.1.10.6] } I restared the snort service and I still getthesealerts. I add these to the threshold.conf: suppress gen_id 100, sig_id 1 suppress gen_id 100, sig_id 2 suppress gen_id 100, sig_id 3 and I still get these alerts. no idea why? Do you know what's the syntax forignore_scannersforone block IP such as 10.1.10.0/24? Thank you so much! John --- Joel Esler <joel.esler@sourcefire.com>wrote:Because you have to include it in the lineprior..See how the lines prior to that have "\"? You have to put the"\"inthe line prior to the ignore_scanners line if you want itincluded..J On Nov 15, 2005, at 3:14 PM, John Friedmanwrote:Thank you for your help. Here is theconfigin mysnort.conf preprocessor sfportscan: proto { all } \ memcap { 10000000} \sense_level { low}ignore_scanners { 10.1.10.6 } But, If I add ignore_scanners { 10.1.10.6} tothesnort.conf, the snort service can not bestarted.IfI remove ignore_scanners { 10.1.10.6 },thenthesnortservice is started fine. No idea why? Thanks, John --- Joel Esler <joel.esler@sourcefire.com>wrote:You need to put them into the sfportscan preprocessor as either ignore_scanned or ignore_scanner if youwanttotunethe portscan preprocessor. Joel Esler On Nov 15, 2005, at 11:27 AM, JohnFriedmanwrote:I constantly get these alerts from thecitrixserver:ID < Signature > < Timestamp > <SourceAddress< Dest. Address > < Layer 4 Proto >#600-(2-7409) [snort]spp_portscanfrom 10.1.10.6: 1 connections across 1hosts:TCP(1),UDP(0) 2005-11-15 09:49:12
=== message truncated ===
__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today
Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam
for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit:
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] No clue?, Eric Maheo |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Snort-users] Beagle traffic, Walt Rich |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Snort-users] No clue?, Eric Maheo |
| Next by Thread: | [Snort-users] Snort 2.4.3 - Windows service fails on boot, Frank.Pikelner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |