Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-users] Quick questions about recieved packets |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:05:10 -0500 |
I am running the following hardware: 3.0 Ghz P4 socket 478 CPU 200 GB SATA HDD 2 GB PC 2700 RAM Board specs are here: http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/P4/E7210/P4SCE.cfm I tried sending the Alerts to a unified alert file. I took a class on Building and Operating Snort back in March ( Thanks again Alex!!!) and learned that the Binary output was the fastest way for Snort to process the information since it does not have to covert it from binary to clear text for me to read. If this would have worked I would have found a way to convert it back to Syslog for my needs. Unfortunately I am dropping about the same amount of packets no matter how I output the Alerts. Here is the interface stats. I am taking a ton of info in each second. GigabitEthernet0/24 is up, line protocol is down (monitoring) 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 213264000 bits/sec, 28623 packets/sec I really am starting to think that I may need more than one sensor for this segment of traffic. I am going to lower the number of ports I am monitoring to 1 and see how that works, then go to two, and etc... until I find the right balance for this one sensor. Currently I have 4 sensors built up for different segments of my network. I can put all of these on this part if I have too for testing. On 10/26/05, Richard Bejtlich <taosecurity@gmail.com> wrote:
Joseph Nicholson wrote:This is my core switch and brings about 5 different network segmentstogether...The monitor port is a Gigabit port and the monitoring ethernet port isrunningat a Gigabit also.Hi Joseph, Do you have an idea of how much bandwidth you are watching on this SPAN port? Can you share some specifications for your hardware -- RAM, PCI bus, etc.? Have you tried just sending alerts to an alert file, for testing? Thank you, Richard http://www.taosecurity.com
-- Joseph Nicholson
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Snort-users] ATTACK-RESPONSES id check returned root, Our World Is Here |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [Snort-users] BO preproc exploit published, Paul Melson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Snort-users] Quick questions about recieved packets, Richard Bejtlich |
| Next by Thread: | [Snort-users] Is this possible answer to the problem?, Peter Rodger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |