Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: [Snort-users] Snort performance concerns |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 30 Sep 2005 10:53:07 -0400 |
I am not sure if you are also using libpcap that supports MMAP mode(Phil Wood's Ring Buffer), but you might want to try that out too. http://public.lanl.gov/cpw/ Cheers, Jeff _____ From: snort-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:snort-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Larry Wichman Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 10:48 AM To: Joel Esler Cc: Snorty S Snortman Subject: Re: [Snort-users] Snort performance concerns All three boxes have the same OS and hardware configuration Linux kernel 2.6 1.5 GHz proc 2 gb RAM Mgt network interface card is 3Com Corporation 3c905C-TX/TX-M [Tornado] Promiscuous network interface card is Intel Corp. 82557/8/9 [Ethernet Pro 100] Snort version 2.3.2 My output method is database and my database is on the same VLAN as all the sensors Mgt interface. It is a high-end Dell server with 4 procs and 4gb RAM and It is running Mysql on Windows 2003. Joel Esler <joel.esler@sourcefire.com> wrote: If you are interested in Sourcefire products, we can definitely put you in touch with someone that will be able to answer all your questions.. Can you please describe the systems that you have? Hardware? RAM, processor... nic card.. OS.. What is your output method? database? unified? pcap? Joel Esler SOURCEfire On Sep 30, 2005, at 10:25 AM, Larry Wichman wrote: I enabled Performance Monitor on my sensors and I have some concerns after looking at some of the performance stats. First, I have three sensors, two of which average 96mb/sec of traffic and the dropped packets percentage average is about 10% (proc and memory utilization are high, as expected). I have a third sensor that sees an average of about 5mb/sec and has the same amount of dropped packets, memory and proc utilization are minimal. I have implemented all the suggested optimizations (I think), patched Libpcap, etc..I can understand that there would be some dropped packets when the traffic is at a high, continuous load, but the third sensor with the same amount of dropped packets with only a fraction of the traffic concerns me. I am thinking about upgrading the hardware (faster proc, bus speeds, etc.), but I might be wasting money if the stats are the same. Does anyone have any input as to what is causing the dropped packets? Also, my boss told me to start evaluating commercial products. My first choice would be Sourcfire, I really do like working with Snort, but I need whatever product I choose to be able to handle the amount of traffic that we have. I would greatly appreciate any input on this. Cheers. Larry
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Snort-users] Snort performance concerns, Jeff Dell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [Snort-users] Snort performance concerns, Joshua Berry |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Snort-users] Snort performance concerns, Larry Wichman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-users] Snort performance concerns, Joel Esler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |