Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-users] Re: ACID/BASE vs PRELUDE |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 19 Sep 2005 16:08:03 -0700 |
Gene R Gomez
Kris Karas wrote:
We set up Prelude to funnel the output from several Snort sensors into a backend DB (MySQL) from which we used Prewikka (the python-based display engine) for viewing. Prewikka is very nice in concept, filters work well, does a decent job of organizing data visually using color-coding. The Prelude-Manager is, I think, the best part of Prelude; it allows data from various sensors to be aggregated, stored, and sent upstream to either another aggregator or else into a database for display. (This is nearly identical to the "event collector" that we used in our ISS RealSecure deployment.)
Back to Prewikka for a moment... I'd prefer an interface that shows aggregate counts in descending order of severity, with an ability to drill-down by src/dst network/address and, eventually, down to individual discrete events. Prewikka instead shows all events in the order in which they were received, but allows you to apply filters if you have some clue of what you're looking for.
On the negative side, Prelude-Manager's DB has serious performance issues that need to be addressed. The fundamental limiting factor is its schema, which puts most forms of data into a single table, along with a tag that identifies the nature of the item. Just pulling up one screenful of log data (50 signatures) could take several minutes. Profiling to see where the bottleneck was shows MySQL fielding some 500+ queries per second to satisfy just that one page view. If you pull up a thousand entries, for example, you might as well go out for lunch.
------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Snort-users] oinkmaster - disabling rules without getting new updates, Humes, David G. |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Snort-users] ACID and Snort rules, snort |
| Previous by Thread: | [Snort-users] Re: ACID/BASE vs PRELUDE, Kris Karas |
| Next by Thread: | [Snort-users] Re: ACID/BASE vs PRELUDE, Kris Karas |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |