Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: [Snort-devel] Re: [Snort-users] Snort DoS Fallacies |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 16 Sep 2005 23:00:36 +0200 |
Q5) Frag3 has the problem in the snapshot I downloaded, why won't you admit it? A5) Because you're wrong. The snapshot you're referring to has the fixes in PrintTcpOptions(), so even with the call to PrintIPPkt() in there the DoS doesn't work. Version 2.4.0 did not have the code you are referring to.
I just grabbed the snapshot tarball from the website and it does have the duplicate log Frag3 issues mentioned... It is correct in CVS, so subsequent snapshot tarballs resolve this. However, with the fixes to PrintTcpOptions being in the tarball, it wouldn't be a DoS problem other than extra printfs.
Q13) Justin Ferguson made a patch against 2.3.3 that fixes this problem, should I use it? A13) I would not under any circumstances move back to 2.3.3 or use a patch from an untrusted 3rd party in a production sensor, there were many bug fixes and new features incorporated in 2.4.0 and reverting to an old version is a step in the wrong direction. It is far safer and advisable to use the log.c in CVS or wait for the 2.4.1 release if you're not running fast/full alerting or ASCII logging.
The changes made on August 23 by Sourcefire are the same as those in the patch to 2.3.3. Those changes have been in the 2.4 CVS repository [and are in the snapshot tarball] for almost a month (since the original poster brought this to our attention). End of story. Cheers. -steve ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Snort-devel] Re: [Snort-users] Snort DoS Fallacies, Steven Sturges |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] ACID/BASE vs PRELUDE, Joel Esler |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [Snort-devel] Re: [Snort-users] Snort DoS Fallacies, Steven Sturges |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [Snort-devel] Re: [Snort-users] Snort DoS Fallacies, Ferguson, Justin (IARC) |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |