Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: [Snort-users] FC4 and RHEL4 binaries? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 29 Aug 2005 09:14:51 -0500 |
By binary I am assuming that you are talking about an RPM or other package format. If you compile from source then it will work great on whatever you compile it on, and you get to make your own binary. There is a guide for CentOS 4, and RHEL 4 on the snort.org site that can walk you through that and configuration. I am working on an updated guide for the new versions of base and snort that I will send in soon. -----Original Message----- From: snort-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:snort-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Eric Wood Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 8:50 AM To: snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Snort-users] FC4 and RHEL4 binaries? Are there any reasons that a RedHat Enterprise kernel is *less capable* to detect intrusion attempt than a fedora kernel? My logic for thinking this is perhaps redhat deliberately turns features off of the enterprise kernel that just doesn't make sense in a production running server. Even CentOS for that matter. I'm new on the list, but is there a FC4 binary in the works? thanks, -eric wood ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Snort-users] FC4 and RHEL4 binaries?, Eric Wood |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Snort-users] how to further diagnose 'ICMP Destination Unreachable' problem?, Chris W. Parker |
| Previous by Thread: | [Snort-users] FC4 and RHEL4 binaries?, Eric Wood |
| Next by Thread: | [Snort-users] how to further diagnose 'ICMP Destination Unreachable' problem?, Chris W. Parker |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |