Nigel Houghton wrote:
First of all, I apologize for the length of this message, I just
included all the replies and the original message purely for the mail
archive being a little more readable.
I-Nodes gentlemen, are the actual issue here. What you are all failing
to mention is that a partition not only relies on the size given to it
but the size of the inodes allowed. Thus, a 10 Gig partition with an
inode size of 1024 will hold considerably more files than the same
partition with an inode size of 4096, quite possibly, four times as
many files.
True, I was strictly placing my case from the "Defaults are just that. Defaults.
They don't work for everyone" perspective. Furthermore, I was arguing that the
default OS install should not be used as a metric for how applications should
use disk. Clearly many applications don't fit this model.
Admittedly my examples of common apps that don't work with "default" setups were
all based on size (bytes), but the same general arguments could be made for
inode count, just different examples would be required.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. How far can you shotput
a projector? How fast can you ride your desk chair down the office luge track?
If you want to score the big prize, get to know the little guy.
Play to win an NEC 61" plasma display: http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
