Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | [Snort-users] complicated snort rule interpretation. |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 27 May 2005 16:39:06 +0800 |
Hello, I'm trying to interpret the following signature but keep failing :-( Does anyone know how the snort kernel process the following signature? When the engine find the content "|07|", why it needs a "within" and "depth" for the following byte_jump? How could this byte_jump happens in a range, not an exact location? Thanks a lot. alert udp $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HOME_NET 500 (msg:"EXPLOIT ISAKMP third payload certificate request length overflow attempt"; byte_test:4,>,2043,24; byte_jump:2,30,relative; content:"|07|"; within:1; distance:-4; byte_jump:2,1,relative; byte_test:2,>,2043,-2,relative; reference:bugtraq,9582; reference:cve,2004-0040; classtype:attempted-admin; sid:237); BRs, Terry.
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] very odd !, Kevin Reiter |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Snort-users] RE: snort and ODBC, Jonathan_Hays |
| Previous by Thread: | [Snort-users] RE: snort and ODBC, McCash, John |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-users] complicated snort rule interpretation., Matt Kettler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |