Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-users] writing virus signatures |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 25 May 2005 15:28:06 -0500 |
So if Snort can clean out the bulk of the traffic thats infected with the common virii then the saving on resources is enormous for me. This does not mean that I do away with the AV servers but that the AV servers work as specialist AV cleaners and Snort works as the general AV cleaner.
How are you planning on doing this? flexresp?
Now comes the part of looking into zip files which is where we still need ClamAV and other AV solutions. My question is that why isn't there a unique identification string in the zipped payloads of the virii/worms? Why do attachments need to be unzipped before being examined since no two files can have the same zip file?
Writing signatures against a zip file, rather than against the payload of the viri is possible I suppose, but in practice probably not a good idea. I think you would end up with a AV signature database larger than anybody would want to manage, probably a high number of false positives, and a signature that would be trivial to circumvent. A lot of times viri have double extensions, which attempt to mask the real extension i.e. .zip.exe would look like .zip. In this case you would not need to unzip anything as the file is actually an MZ or PE executable for which you could create a valid signature. Regards, Will ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: GoToMeeting - the easiest way to collaborate online with coworkers and clients while avoiding the high cost of travel and communications. There is no equipment to buy and you can meet as often as you want. Try it free.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt02&alloc_id135&opÌk _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] Wacky perfmonitor numbers, Gary Richardson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Snort-users] Any way to change permissions of the unified output files?, Rob Baxter |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Snort-users] writing virus signatures, Siddhartha Jain |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-users] writing virus signatures, Siddhartha Jain |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |