Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | [Snort-users] Acceptable packet loss? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 23 May 2005 18:03:01 -0400 |
What do most of you consider to acceptable packet loss? I am running snort 2.1 on some fairly low end hardware and have tuned the box using some suggestions from Mark Kettler in one of his earlier posts to the list (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=snort-users&m=105586643024094&w=2). I am seeing about 4% packet loss on this sensor during my (un-scientific) testing. Would you consider that acceptable or should I look into further tuning? Byron Pezan ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7412&alloc_id=16344&op=click _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] snorcenter2, Base, bleeding rules and sid-msg.map, Wes Young |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] Acceptable packet loss?, Matt Kettler |
| Previous by Thread: | [Snort-users] snortcenter include commands, East, Bill |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-users] Acceptable packet loss?, Matt Kettler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |