Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Snort-Users
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Snort-users] why old libnet?

Subject: RE: [Snort-users] why old libnet?
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:17:51 -0600
I have seen that flexresp works very well in blocking outbound P2P and
chat programs. I would like seeing more advancement in this feature.

Thanks...

-----Original Message-----
From: snort-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
[mailto:snort-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Matt
Kettler
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 11:16 AM
To: snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Snort-users] why old libnet?

Florin Andrei wrote:

What is the reason why Snort can only use the old, deprecated,
libnet-1.0.x?
Since other apps are likely to use already the newer, supported,
libnet-1.1, there might be conflicts on systems using both types of
apps.


Really, the only part of snort that uses libnet is flexresp. If you're
not using flexresp, snort shouldn't be looking for libnet.

As for flexresp itself, it's getting to be a bit on the "aged" side. I
know one of the SF guys (Chris? Jeff?) was working on a "flexresp2", but
it looks like 2.3.2 still only includes the old version.

I also think that while Flexresp is useful, people believe it to be more
useful than it is. Flexresp is really pretty limited. It's useful
against automated probes, but really only acts as a hurdle to jump over
for a skilled manual attack. Even against automated probes, flexresp
isn't 100% effective, since it relies on being able to advance the TCP
sequence number first. Flexresp uses some tricks to give it a major
advantage, but it still boils down to being a race condition.

Now that snort has an official inline module, you really should consider
using it instead of flexresp if inline is feasible in your network and
on your platform.


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&opÌk
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>