Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Snort-Users
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Snort-users] Rules Question

Subject: RE: [Snort-users] Rules Question
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:05:38 -0500
So even using the -o flag, the preprocessors are applied first (before my
'pass' rules)? 

There are a few reasons I'd like to simply ignore traffic before anything
else is applied, including

* internal IPs are masqueraded into a range of external IPs and are
generating port scan alerts. I'd like to ignore the 'legit' traffic
(80,443,21,etc) while not ignoring the potentially bad traffic
(135,137-139,445, IRC bots on 1337).

* on my internal network, my backup server uses RPC pretty heavily, but I
don't want to ignore anything coming from or going to it.

And so on...

If I did all this using a BPF, it would get cumbersome quickly. That's why
I'm searching for an alternative.

Thanks,
Roy



-----Original Message-----
From: snort-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net 
[mailto:snort-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of 
Jeff Dell
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 3:53 PM
To: 'Roy Kidder'; snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Snort-users] Rules Question

These rules will not stop the preprocessors, what you want to 
do is add
options in the portscan preprocessor to ignore from certain 
hosts. To remove
certain hosts all together without worrying about any of 
these pass rules,
just add a (Berkeley packet filter)bpf to the end of the 
command to start
Snort.

Example:
Snort -d -A fast -c snort.conf not (src host 192.168.1.5 and 
dst port 80)


Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Roy Kidder [mailto:rkidder@safelite.net] 
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 3:41 PM
To: 'Jeff Dell'; snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Snort-users] Rules Question

Even when using the -o flag, I still get alerts on many 
things. For example,

pass udp 192.168.1.33 any -> any 161

still generates alerts for 'SNMP request udp'

and neither sfscan nor a rules like:

pass ip  192.168.1.5/32 any -> any 80
pass tcp 192.168.1.5/32 any -> any 80

stop the '(portscan) Open Port' alerts for regular web browsing.

Anyone have any suggestions?


-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Dell [mailto:jdell@activeworx.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 9:04 AM
To: 'Roy Kidder'; snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Snort-users] Rules Question

Check your rules order. By default it is alert -> pass -> log 
-> etc...

Try adding the flag -o to your command line options when 
starting snort.

Cheers,
Jeff 

-----Original Message-----
From: snort-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net 
[mailto:snort-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of 
Roy Kidder
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 8:26 AM
To: snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Snort-users] Rules Question

I'm trying to write what I expected to be a simple set rules, 
but it's not
working for me. They look like this:

pass udp any any <> 10.0.0.10 53
pass udp any any <> 192.168.1.5 53
alert udp any any <> any 53 (msg: "DNS Query";)

What I expected was to alert on any DNS queries except those 
to 10.0.0.10 or
to 192.168.1.5. Instead, I'm seeing alerts on everything 
including those two
hosts. 

Any pointers on what I did wrong?

Thanks in advance,
Roy

 
Roy Kidder
Network Engineer
Safelite Glass Corp.




-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from 
real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start 
reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users










-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from 
real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users




-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>