Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: [Snort-users] Rules Question |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:41:02 -0500 |
Even when using the -o flag, I still get alerts on many things. For example, pass udp 192.168.1.33 any -> any 161 still generates alerts for 'SNMP request udp' and neither sfscan nor a rules like: pass ip 192.168.1.5/32 any -> any 80 pass tcp 192.168.1.5/32 any -> any 80 stop the '(portscan) Open Port' alerts for regular web browsing. Anyone have any suggestions?
-----Original Message----- From: Jeff Dell [mailto:jdell@activeworx.com] Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 9:04 AM To: 'Roy Kidder'; snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [Snort-users] Rules Question Check your rules order. By default it is alert -> pass -> log -> etc... Try adding the flag -o to your command line options when starting snort. Cheers, Jeff-----Original Message----- From: snort-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:snort-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Roy Kidder Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 8:26 AM To: snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Snort-users] Rules Question I'm trying to write what I expected to be a simple set rules, but it's not working for me. They look like this: pass udp any any <> 10.0.0.10 53 pass udp any any <> 192.168.1.5 53 alert udp any any <> any 53 (msg: "DNS Query";) What I expected was to alert on any DNS queries except those to 10.0.0.10 or to 192.168.1.5. Instead, I'm seeing alerts on everything including those two hosts. Any pointers on what I did wrong? Thanks in advance, Roy Roy Kidder Network Engineer Safelite Glass Corp. ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Startreading now.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] writing rule with uricontent keyword, Matt Kettler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] snort-inline and iptables INPUT chain, Victor Julien |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [Snort-users] Rules Question, Jeff Dell |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [Snort-users] Rules Question, Jeff Dell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |