Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: [Snort-users] http_inspect config options? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Sat, 26 Feb 2005 08:47:57 -0800 |
You might want to try editing the line?
preprocessor http_inspect_server: server 10.1.0.3 profile iis ports { 80
8080 8180 } oversize_dir_length 500 double_decode no
Kindest regards,
Michael...
WINSNORT.com Management Team Member
--
Pick up your FREE Windows or UNIX Snort installation guides
mailto:support@winsnort.com
Website: http://www.winsnort.com
Snort: Open Source Network IDS - http://www.snort.org
-----Original Message----- From: snort-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:snort-users- admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Rich Adamson Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2005 4:56 AM To: Snort Users Postings Subject: [Snort-users] http_inspect config options? I'm trying to tune the http_inspect preprocessor on a v2.3rc2 win32 system using an entry like: preprocessor http_inspect_server: server 10.1.0.3 \ profile iis ports { 80 8080 8180 } oversize_dir_length 500 \ double_decode no After making the change to include the "double_decode no" statement, snort fails to start complain about that statement. Commenting it out allows snort to start correctly. The doc\README.http_inspect file suggests this is a valid option, but I can't seem to find a syntax that actually is accepted. The sample in the etc\snort.conf suggests I'm using the correct syntax but obviously something is amiss. Thoughts anyone? ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Snort-users] http_inspect config options?, Rich Adamson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] snortsam - iptables problem, Frank Knobbe |
| Previous by Thread: | [Snort-users] http_inspect config options?, Rich Adamson |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [Snort-users] http_inspect config options?, Rich Adamson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |