Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: [Snort-users] Re: Noob |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 23 Dec 2004 16:18:32 -0600 |
OK hang with me here. I've done a great deal of reading and all. This isn't your average network reading. So I'm still a little hazy on it all. As for multiple sensors...I presume then you would need multiple network cards for those sensors? As for what I'm seeing...well I'm gonna do what I do best and blame Microsoft. All I see is large amounts of NETBIOS traffic on the network pertaining to the domain and well...windows doing what windows does and it all seems to set off alerts. I guess I don't know what to think of that cause it just seems wrong to shut off the alerts/rules for that but at the same time what else can I do? Setting the EXTERNAL_NET to !HOME_NET is basically shutting off what I want to accomplish by monitoring my internal network. I can see however where that would be handy for the external sensor. I guess I've just had a hard time finding and understanding the documentation that I've read. Thanks to all for your help Brian -----Original Message----- From: Frank Knobbe [mailto:frank@knobbe.us] Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 4:07 PM To: Brian Stamper Cc: snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [Snort-users] Re: Noob On Thu, 2004-12-23 at 15:35 -0600, Brian Stamper wrote:
OK so I've originally wanted snort running inside my network to make sure I'm not being attacked inside or scanned. Things of that nature. However as I look for explanation on why I'm getting all of the false SMB
Microsoft
type traffic I see that most people use the var EXTERNAL_NET !$HOME_NET.
So
what I gather is that people are not monitoring their local networks traffic? Am I barking up the wrong tree here with what I want or does it just take some configuration to get around the false positives that I'm seeing?
Not at all. Snort placement and configuration is not a black or white thing. For example, we have installations in client networks that are configured for both :) It depends where you monitor and what you want to look for. We even have some sensors that have a duplicate "include rule" sections. First we set EXTERNAL_NET to !HOME_NET, include most rules, then set EXTERNAL_NET to any and include a specific subset of rules. You have to take a look at your setup and decide if you want to alert on hostile intruders or on hostile insiders :) You will probably find yourself running both, with different configurations and perhaps on different sensors. (Tip: Focus on intruders at your connectivity points -- Internet, WAN links, dial-in, wireless, etc -- and focus on insiders within your server segments and cores.) Hope that helps, Frank ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Snort-users] Re: Noob, Frank Knobbe |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] Re: Noob, J-H Johansen |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [Snort-users] Re: Noob, Frank Knobbe |
| Next by Thread: | [Snort-users] Alternate Alerting for Snort - phone, Michael Bowman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |