Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: [Snort-users] Re: Noob |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 23 Dec 2004 15:06:21 -0600 |
Well below is almost exactly what I'm seeing in all of those packets. I understand this isn't the place for this really so if anyone has any ideas of where I go to start looking into this sort of thing. Sometimes there is an "A" behind the P and sometimes there is nothing at all but other than that they are all the same. length = 104 000 : 00 00 00 64 FF 53 4D 42 A2 00 00 00 00 18 07 C8 ...d.SMB........ 010 : 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 06 A8 9C 07 ................ 020 : 00 50 C1 1D 18 FF 00 DE DE 00 0E 00 16 00 00 00 .P.............. 030 : 00 00 00 00 9F 01 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 040 : 00 00 00 00 03 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 ............@... 050 : 02 00 00 00 03 11 00 00 5C 00 77 00 69 00 6E 00 ........\.w.i.n. 060 : 72 00 65 00 67 00 00 00 r.e.g... Thanks, Brian -----Original Message----- From: Bob Konigsberg [mailto:bobkberg@networkeval.com] Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 2:29 PM To: 'Brian Stamper'; snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [Snort-users] Re: Noob I'm going off on somewhat of a tangent here, but I think it's useful. Have you done any packet captures of the traffic that's tripping the alerts? If you're using ACID, the packet data will be at the bottom of the display for any given alert. And of course Ethereal, tcpdump/windump are also your friends here. Once you look at the type of traffic and characterize it as normal or not, then you'll be in a better position to judge what's a threat. As for the "random" port numbers from the Citrix, the first thing I'd want to know is how many users are logged into to it, and whether or not their activity is in any way related to what you're seeing. Bottom line is that you're going to have to do some serious learning about the nature of traffic on your network, so that you can start applying the rules in a way that makes sense for you. What is normal on my network might be harmful on yours and vice-versa. Bob -----Original Message----- From: snort-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:snort-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Brian Stamper Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 11:31 AM To: 'snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net' Subject: [Snort-users] Re: Noob OK so I've got everything up and running well. Just now put it on a monitored port. Let it go for 1 min and ended up with 159 alerts. I've edited the snort.conf and added my home network rather than any as well as entered the IP's of my DNS/SMTP server variables. I have 10 unique alerts largest below: 75 - protocol-command-decode - NETBIOS SMB winreg Unicode access Everything in this group is headed from my Proxy/DNS server to either my Citrix Servers or my Domain controller. Orig. port is mostly 42385,1028,14146 and the dest. Port is always 139. Any Ideas of what's going on here causing all of these or is this just standard operating and network traffic that I need to block out? 30 - protocol-command-decode - NETBIOS SMB IPC$ share Unicode access Again most of this is coming form random ports on the Citrix servers headed for port 139 on other servers and significant machines...almost looks like normal traffic? 21 - attempted-admin - NETBIOS SMB DCERPC NTLMSSP asn1 overflow attempt This comes from everywhere yet again is always destined for port 139 of some significant machine? Again I'm running Snort 2.2.0 on a network w/ about 300 or so devices. Does this look normal to everyone and do I just need to block this type of stuff so that it doesn't get logged as alerts or do you think it might actually be a problem. Thanks so much in advance. Brian ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Snort-users] Re: Noob, Bob Konigsberg |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [Snort-users] Re: Noob, Bob Konigsberg |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Snort-users] Re: Noob, Brian Caswell |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [Snort-users] Re: Noob, Bob Konigsberg |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |