Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | [Snort-users] Snort Rules |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 23 Dec 2004 20:23:13 +0100 (MET) |
Hi, I'm quite a newbie on snort, so please excuse my basic questions: The following describes the way I understand the behaviour and use of snort rules in the inernal system. Please comment on this (and correct me :~)). First of all, snort divides all rules in (at least) 4 parts, based on protocol (TCP/UDP/ICMP/IP). Now, there's a RuleTreeNode (RTN) for every type of - let's say TCP - rule 'below' the main protocol list (rules that have identical src/dest ips AND identical min/max src ports are combined, so you can check several rules in one time). This RTN contains rule information, esp. two linked lists for source and destination IP addresses and min/max- src/dest port (along with some flags and other stuff, necessary to check if the current packet belongs to this rule group). Additionally, a linked list with the rule-specific barebones exits (OptTreeNode = OPT). Here you can find the rules metadata and some keywords (statefule inspection). And that's exactly the point where I'm hampered. AFAIK you should find here e.g. the content to search for, in short: every rule-specific information that cannot be used to create deeper groups. But there is none! So, could anyone tell me first, whether the above statements are correct, second if this also applies to the new rule engine in snort 2.x and third how the system continues at the point where I'm stucked. Now, I excuse for my bad english and whish you all 'Merry Christmas' Peter P.S.: Just to mention, why does snort fire several alerts per packet? Shouldn't be one enough? -- +++ Sparen Sie mit GMX DSL +++ http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl AKTION f|r Wechsler: DSL-Tarife ab 3,99 EUR/Monat + Startguthaben ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Snort-users] Inline IP_Forwarding and other simple questions?, mdpeters |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Snort-users] Re: Noob, Brian Stamper |
| Previous by Thread: | [Snort-users] Inline IP_Forwarding and other simple questions?, mdpeters |
| Next by Thread: | [Snort-users] Re: Noob, Brian Stamper |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |