Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Snort-Users
[Top] [All Lists]

[Snort-users] Using snort as connection tracker

Subject: [Snort-users] Using snort as connection tracker
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 16:15:25 +0100
Hello,

 

I'm kinda new in >advanced< snort configuration. Until now i only used it
with >default< cfg & rules. Now i have a problem, I'm runing on linux server
2 gameservers on udp port 27960 & 28960 i made 2 custom rules to track that
connections:

 

alert udp $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HOME_NET 27960 (msg:"Enemy Territory
player";)

 

alert udp $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HOME_NET 28960 (msg:"Call of Duty player";)

 

 

now i have a problem couse every packet is logged (and logs are huge) even
if it's only about 1k big and it is product of outside scan of server not
actual connection to it. Is there anyway to log only first and last package
from 1 ip and only if data transfer is bigger then let's say 5k? Or maybe
anyother way to log that connections? I also tryed with chaosreader &
tcpdump but this method is too much cpu & ram consuming and i also tried
with iptable but again with same problem (every package is logged). I relay
wanna use snort because i can use mysql & acid for statistic...

 

 

Thx

 

 

PS: sorry for my bad english ;)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>