Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Snort-Users
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Snort-users] Advice on quad ethernet card

Subject: RE: [Snort-users] Advice on quad ethernet card
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 16:22:08 -0500
Darden, Patrick S. wrote:

I don't think this is a good idea.  You will see a lot of drops if you have
any amount of traffic at all.  

Hello Patrick D and Patrick M,

I disagree with this opinion, but I respect your caution.  Still, if
"a lot of drops" occurred with "any amount of traffic at all," how
could vendors ever sell quad NICs?

Your Snort performance is a function of the following components:

- CPU
- RAM
- Hard drive
- PCI bus
- NIC quality
- Sensor OS
- Snort Configuration

These are not in any particular order.  

Choosing a high-quality quad NIC -- or any NIC -- is important.  (Ask
old Realtek owners.)

I've had good quad NIC capture results for 10/100 Mbps with the
Adaptec ANA-62044.  [0]  The ANA-62044 isn't sold new, so Adaptec's
upgrade product is a 66 MHz 64 bit card.  [1]  The ANA-62044 is a 33
MHz 64 bit card.

I believe Intel makes some of the best NICs around, but their current
quad NIC is a gigabit card.  [2]  For that reason I would avoid it,
unless you conduct rigorous testing.  When you start thinking you can
monitor multiple gigabit links with a quad NIC, you need to be using a
robust PCI-X bus and not regular PCI, plus carefully handling all of
the other performance factors listed earlier.

Patrick D's recommendation of using two dual NICs might also work. 
I've used Intel PRO/100+ Dual Port Server Adapters (PILA8472),
although I had to replace one of them after a hardware failure. 
Intel's new dual NICs are either 10/100 Mbps crypto-enabled models or
gigabit models. [3, 4]

Whatever you decide, you should try building a test sensor and see how
it performs in your environment.

Sincerely,

Richard
http://www.taosecurity.com

[0]  
http://www.adaptec.com/worldwide/support/suppdetail.jsp?sess=no&language=English+US&prodkey=ANA-62044
[1] 
http://www.adaptec.com/worldwide/product/proddetail.html?sess=no&language=English+US&prodkey=ANA-64044LV
[2] 
http://www.intel.com/network/connectivity/products/pro1000mt_quad_server_adapter.htm
[3] http://www.intel.com/network/connectivity/products/pro100dport_adapter.htm
[4] 
http://www.intel.com/network/connectivity/products/pro1000mt_dual_server_adapter.htm


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE
FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines
robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match
for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>