Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Snort-Users
[Top] [All Lists]

[Snort-users] Re: Snort Tool Evaluation

Subject: [Snort-users] Re: Snort Tool Evaluation
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:54:12 -0400
M Shirk wrote:

There are differences between 2.0 and 2.1, but not enough to get the
[Syngress] 2.1 book.

--

I disagree.  I read and reviewed both 'Snort 2.0' [0] and 'Snort 2.1'
by Syngress. [1]  From my Amazon.com review of 'Snort 2.1':

'The table of contents for "Snort 2.1" is deceiving, as it is almost
exactly the same as "Snort 2.0." However, the new book is almost 200
pages larger than its predecessor, with many internal modifications.
Chapters 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 11, 12 and 13 are either completely new or
substantially new. Chapters 5, 6, 7, 8, and 10 are either partial
rewrites or have some material added or dropped.'

'Snort 2.1' isn't perfect but it's still the best available Snort
reference outside of the project documentation.

My problem with O'Reilly's 'Managing Snort and IDS Tools' concerns its
coverage of Sguil.  The authors claim:

"Where connecting to ACID is easy since it is a web-based interface,
the only way to get a remote client to connect to a central server is
by using an exported X-session (a security no-no)...  A daunting
installation, poor client model, and lack of many new features make it
difficult to recommend Sguil. I advise sticking with ACID."

While I agree that Sguil's installation isn't simple, the O'Reilly
"Managing" book mangles Sguil beyond recognition.  While it is
technically possible to access the Sguil client via an exported X
session, that method has never been advocated nor documented.  Sguil
is inherently a client-server application, where the sguil.tk client
(On Windows, UNIX, or OS X) connects through an SSL-encrypted channel
to a sguild server (typically on a UNIX variant).  The fact that the
O'Reilly authors missed this crucial point demonstrates they didn't
put the time or effort into understanding Sguil well enough to comment
upon it in writing.

The "Managing" authors also fault Sguil for a "lack of many new
features" -- when compared to ACID?  Only thanks to the BASE project
are we seeing any innovation in ACID. [2]  The last official ACID
release was 0.9.6b23 in Jan 03, aside from CVS updates.

On the positive side, I liked seeing how the "Managing" authors tried to handle 
asymmetric routing in chapter 13.  These sorts of issues deserve more attention.

Sincerely,

Richard 
http://www.taosecurity.com

[1] http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/customer-reviews/1931836043/
[0] http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/customer-reviews/1931836744/
[2] http://sourceforge.net/projects/secureideas


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Snort-users] Re: Snort Tool Evaluation, Richard Bejtlich <=