Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-users] Multiple instances of Snort |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:59:11 -0400 |
Forking an instance of Snort for each user seems like overkill to me...
Just my $.02.
-Marty
On Sep 24, 2004, at 4:44 PM, Rich Adamson wrote:
Thanks for the reply. The reason I want multiple instances of Snort (andIn short, here's what I'd like to do:
I am a security technician for a college, and the college runs a public
cyber cafe. We also offer wireless access. One of the problems is that
there is little auditing in place for the wireless users. I'd like to
setup IAS (I have to use Windows, otherwise I'd use freeradius.org), but
there is no "nice" frontend for IAS. I'm thinking I could use MySQL and
PHP and exec() IAS's command line options since IAS does not yet have
scripting support. Here's where Snort would come in. Snort would log the
packets coming to and from a user, and if something fires a filter in
Snort, it would alert the cyber cafe monitor, and based on the
severity/number of alerts for the user, the cyber cafe monitor could
kill the session for the user. So, I'd like to fork Snort for each user.
I don't expect more than say 5 wireless users at a time, but of course
the more that I can get the application and Snort to scale, the better.
My question is how well would Snort handle in such an environment with
regards to resources, or is something like this even possible currently?
There are lots of very different ways to handle wireless stuff, and snort
can do a piece of that. Not sure I understand why you want multiple
instances of snort running, but I have several Win32 machines running
with multiple snort "services", each monitoring via a different nic
card. Works rather well, however I'd have to guess it wouldn't handle
high volume traffic all that well. Never tested, so not 100% positive.
Another approach is to use static IP's on each wireless unit, and if
someone tries to access via dhcp, hand them an IP and default gateway
that leads to a honeypot with alerting capability. Mapping mac addresses
to IP's also has some value as well.
maybe I'm overthinking this, I don't know) is so that I can have the
alert packets logged to mysql and/or the filesystem for that user.
Here's (hopefully) a better explanation.
1. A user registers for the first time and they are given their username
and password that lasts for say 3 hours. Or, they have already
registered, and they are given their username and password that lasts x
hours.
2. Once they sign in, I would fork Snort for that user's session. Snort
would just be running in NIDS mode. Then I have a ruleset that detects
an attempt to say have a Bitorrent server running off of the user's
laptop. An alert would fire, and the lab monitor would see it, and based
on our policy, wait to see if anything more happens or immediately kill
the session for that user. We can later go back and run a report and
tell those higher-up that this person was doing x at y time.
3. However, during that time, another user signs in and is given their
temporary username and password.
4. Another Snort process is started, and is monitoring only them.
However, if we only had a single Snort process, and though Snort does
log for the various IP addresses, we would have a more difficult time
tracking down which IP address belongs to which user. Unfortunately
static IP addresses are not an option.
That's my reasoning behind the forking anyway.
Think that might be a little overkill. If I were one of you users and decided to run VoIP across your network, how would you know I'm doing that (assuming you didn't want me to do that)?
Might be chasing your tail trying to control the users.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
-- Martin Roesch - Founder/CTO, Sourcefire Inc. - +1-410-290-1616 Sourcefire - Discover. Determine. Defend. roesch@sourcefire.com - http://www.sourcefire.com Snort: Open Source Network IDS - http://www.snort.org
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] confuse with alerts file, Bamm Visscher |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [Snort-users] packet loss, Marc Norton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Snort-users] Multiple instances of Snort, Rich Adamson |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [Snort-users] Upgrade of Snort, O'Flynn, Derek |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |