Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: [Snort-users] Snort on Cisco 6509 |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 31 Aug 2004 04:52:46 -0700 (PDT) |
The IP address is the same as what? No no ...you don't even need an IP address on the Snort promiscious adapter. You should have at least two adapters. One for management and one for sniffing. You can't monitor a Gigabit connection with a Mbit connection. Put the firewall on a Mbit connection. Cheese! Marc --__--__-- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 14:28:36 -0400 From: Network Intern <nsintern@hamilton.edu> To: snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Snort-users] Snort on Cisco 6509 Hi Everyone, We have SNORT 2.0.2 running on Red Hat Linux release 9 (Shrike). We are monitoring the traffic that enters and exits our PIX firewall. Snort was up and running very well, until we had to make some network changes. Initially snort was connected to a Cisco 35xx series switch and was spanning (port monitoring) the interface connected to our firewall. Currently we have connected the firewall directly to a Giga bit interface on our core switch (Cisco 6509) and hence we had to shift the location of snort to be connected directly to a 100 Mbit connection on the 6509. Currenlty we have set spanning on the 6509's 100 Mbit connection, to which snort is connected to monitor the Giga bit connection that is connected to the firewall. However SNORT is not able to detect any alerts other than those to its own interface. So if we were to scan snort it would show up, but if we tried to scan the firewall it would not show up. The IP address of Snort is the same as the 100Mbit port on the 6509 is put on the Vlan that snort was configured. I noticed that the NIC was not in promiscuous mode so I set it to be in promiscuous mode. The output of the show span from the 6509 is ********************************************************************** CJ_6509> (enable) show span Destination : Port 3/8 Admin Source : Port 7/15 Oper Source : Port 7/15 Direction : transmit/receive Incoming Packets: enabled Learning : enabled Multicast : disabled Filter : - Status : active Total local span sessions: 1 *********************************************8 It would be of great help if you would kindly drop in some suggestions Thanks a lot Sherly Abraham nsintern@hamilton.edu Network Services Hamilton College __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] Snort, Swatch, and perl modules, stephane nasdrovisky |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Snort-users] Database ERROR:Got error 124 from table handler, Jeff Heckart |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Snort-users] Snort on Cisco 6509, Rich Adamson |
| Next by Thread: | [Snort-users] data structure for snort rules, snort user |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |