Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-sigs] old rules with newer snort |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 5 Mar 2008 09:13:11 -0800 |
There is another potential "gotcha" to consider if you're attempting to take an older rule set and make it work with Snort 2.8.x. IF you have a lot of pass rules, you will need to be sure that each pass rule is assigned a unique sig_sid..... Historically, pass rules didn't require sig_sids, and they also didn't detect duplication in use of sig_sids. Historically, we had written numerous pass rules for situations of detection rules triggering off benign traffic. And, to address, we would write highly specific pass rules where the rule option portion would utilize the same sig_sid as the detection rule (so that we could easily reference which detection rule the pass rule was tuning). This workflow broke with Snort 2.8. I understand the need to be efficient with reuse of code and I suspect this is where/why the enforcement of unique sig_sids came into play with Snort 2.8. But, it did produce hurdle for upgrading to Snort 2.8, and something to consider if you have large numbers of pass rules that currently don't have sig_sids or they aren't all unique. Cheers, John On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Sven Wurth <swurth@astaro.com> wrote:
We like to use older rules with a newer snort only for a short time, because of a migration. Thanks for your quick response! Kind regards Sven ________________________________________ Von: Joel Esler [mailto:joel.esler@sourcefire.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. MÃrz 2008 17:30 An: Sven Wurth Cc: Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net Betreff: Re: [Snort-sigs] old rules with newer snort Yes, You can use older rules with a newer Snort, but not newer rules with an older Snort. Why would you want to use older rules? Can't you use the current ones? Joel On Mar 5, 2008, at 11:11 AM, Sven Wurth wrote: Hi Snort-sigs Does anybody know if it's possible to use old snort rules with a newer snort? Example: vrt-rules in Version 2.6 and a snort 2.8 Thanks Kind regards Sven ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/_______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs -- Joel Esler ï joel.esler@sourcefire.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-sigs] old rules with newer snort, Sven Wurth |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Snort-sigs] Emerging Threats Daily Signature Changes, emerging |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Snort-sigs] old rules with newer snort, Sven Wurth |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-sigs] old rules with newer snort, Jason |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |