Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Snort-Signatures
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Snort-sigs] about the alert 'WEB-CGI abc access' and 'WEB-CGE abc a

Subject: Re: [Snort-sigs] about the alert 'WEB-CGI abc access' and 'WEB-CGE abc attempt'
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 14:25:49 -0500
comment in line.

Mingming Sun wrote:
Hi, 

 

 

         I found that there are commonly two similar type of alerts in
WEB-CGI alerts. One is in the form ‘WEB-CGI abc access’, while the other
is in the form of ‘WEB-CGI abc attempt’, where abc stands for some exe pl
or cgi file name. 

 

         The detection rules of these two type of alerts differ from each
other in the fact that the first one detect the name of the executed file,
that is ‘abc, while the second one detect the ‘abc?’. For my knowledge,
the first class of alert will be fired when someone want to run the program
without any parameter, while the second with parameters. 

 

         The question is: since the execution of the program without any
parameter always does not really do anything harmful, why the snort capture
the behavior and report it? Does the snort think the behavior is a test for
the existing of the program and the execution of program with parameters
will follow?

 

Vulnerability scanners usually test for the existence of files and they
don't
always test to see if the files do anything.  That is why there are
normally two rules,
one that looks for someone doing recon "access" and one that looks for
something
trying to use the file "attempt".

Cheers,
-matt



         Best wishes!

 

 

 
Mingming Sun ‘ 




------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/


------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Snort-sigs mailing list
Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Snort-sigs mailing list
Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>