Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-sigs] About the ICMP reply |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 07 Jan 2008 14:40:22 -0600 |
Quoting Sun <snortmaillist@gmail.com>:
For example, 'ICMP Timestamp Request' are from external to home, but the 'ICMP Timestamp Reply' is still from external to home, then how can we detect the reply from the home server?
If you believe that some outsider sending an ICMP Timestamp request is an alertable event (because somebody is probing your network) the first rule will alert you. If one of your inside machines *replies* to the Timestamp request that should perhaps also be an alertable event (because it means your firewall is misconfigured). The default icmp.rules has no rule for the "my firewall is misconfigured" finding. Perhaps it should. Nice catch.
Furthermore, 'ICMP Address Mask Reply' are from home to external,
That is to alert you that your firewall is misconfigured or the server network options are misconfigured. Not a security finding as much as a "heads-up" alert.
but 'ICMP Address Mask Reply undefined code' are from external to home,
To alert you to the fact that a server somewhere on your network is sending out ICMP traffic that is totally bogus. That's a far more scary thing than any of the others you've mentioned.
Consider the task of snort is to protect the user in home net, I
Wow, that is a messy subject: eight years ago, the "task of snort" was to alert us to hackers trying to break into our DNS servers and Mail servers (and send "shun" commands to the firewall very quickly). four years ago, the "task of snort" was to alert us to buffer overruns, brute force attacks, and anomalous network traffic wether sourced from inside or outside. today, I would say that one of the most important "tasks of snort" is to alert on internal malware infections, spyware infections, and internal bots gone berzerk.
Can any body tell me whether my above oponion is correct or not?
All opinions are (by definition) *correct* including this one. tc ------------------------------------------------- Email solutions, MS Exchange alternatives and extrication, security services, systems integration. Contact: services@doctorunix.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-sigs] About the connection in the alert of BackDoor, Joel Esler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Snort-sigs] Emerging Threats Daily Signature Changes, emerging |
| Previous by Thread: | [Snort-sigs] About the ICMP reply, Sun |
| Next by Thread: | [Snort-sigs] About the ICMP reply, Sun |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |